|
When the Church
Was Led Only by Laymen
by Gene
Edwards
This book is a transcript from a men’s
conference of house churches, in which Gene was the speaker. A brief book that
provides a clear view of our ministry philosophy at cciph.
“I am a
minister and grateful to God for that. But I must not think ‘me.’ I must
think ‘you.’ And you must join me in this perspective. My job: to utterly
work myself out of a job. My job is not ministry nor to minister. My job is to
turn a church over to brothers. . . . The
church is to find its leadership and direction through brothers.
[There are
only two or three types of people you find in page after page of the New
Testament:]
“The first thing you see is church
planters. They are all over the place, on every page. There are about twenty
such men in the first-century drama. These men planted churches. Apostles are men whom God sent out to plant
churches. That is what “sent ones” do.
Not “sent out” to evangelize the world, mind you. No, rather, they are
men “sent out” to enter a town and raise
up a church. That, and that alone, is the primary function of sent
ones. (Lay aside what came to your mind when you read church
just now. Those men did not raise up
church buildings.)
“Who else
is center stage throughout the book of Acts?
“The second thing you will find is the ecclesia. She is wild and free and
wonderful and glorious!
“. . . the
first century church planter, having raised up a church, leaves!
He leaves soon, quick, fast! (try to get a present-day minister to do that!)
“If you
listen to men speak about the way eldership is supposed to be, you would
conclude, listening to them, that the word ‘elder’ is on every page of the
New Testament.
“Or you
have the same disease that prevails in the traditional churches. They see
‘pastor’ on every page of the New Testament. (Pastor appears once in the New
Testament. But he never appears in the story. Try to find him, for instance, in
acts.
“Read it
and weep. Or join the revolution! That third person, so often mentioned in the
saga of the first century is . . . you are about to see the third main person on
the stage of the first-century drama. There is the church planter, the church
and . . . the brothers.
“Do you
belong to a church with this vocabulary?
Do the acts of brothers in the
ecclesia fill your daily vocabulary? Automatically, spontaneously, unconsciously
. . . simply because such sights and actions and ways fill so much of your daily
matrix?
“Reread
the Scripture. There are only three kinds of persons who hold center stage in
the first-century faith. A church planter. An ecclesia. And thirdly?
You have brothers; you have sisters.
That’s it. That’s all. That is about all there is in the entire epistles and
the book of Acts. Anything else? You’re chasing up trees for squirrels that
don’t exist. You are putting organizations, people and teachings at the center
stage which should not even be in existence!
[the church
in
Jerusalem
had elders after 17 years, and not before!] Consider this, just before you get
elder happy: Those elders came out of brothers!
In a first-century type atmosphere there were always brothers before
elders.
“How about
this idea, then? A compromise: ‘Once a week, let’s allow
laymen to preach, instead of the pastor.’
“Try it.
It would be disastrous, because this is not coming up out of the soil of a
‘brothers’ atmosphere. This is something being pasted on to a present
mindset. Listen! Laymen do not know how to minister.
“Until…
“And only
until…
“Put them
in a tribe and get the minister out of town. I mean by that . . . leave
them. Leave those men to discover,
leave them to sink or swim, and suddenly they do minister! It is called ‘action born out of the law of
preservation.’ It is the action of survival.
“Laymen
functioning in a traditional church? consider this, and you will find how
utterly impossible this will ever be.
“How great
is it when ten or more men get together to shape the direction of the
kingdom
of
God
? In all your Christian life, what Christian meeting or gathering can you
remember which you really wanted to go to…every
time it met? A meeting you look forward to every week of your life? Have you
ever known such a drive? Such meetings exist.
“Brothers
meetings!
“What is
it like? I cannot tell you.
“You are
free to not be reverent. You are free to get things off your chest. There is
confidentiality. A place even to pontificate or philosophize. (Brothers love to
do that.) You are free to be who you are. You are free to be a pain to the other
brothers. You are free to make mistakes. Lots and lots of mistakes. You are even
free to make the death move of all death moves: You are even free to try to
become the leader of the brothers. We
get a discount rate at the graveyard where such men are buried!
“These
innocent words ‘brother’ and ‘brothers’ which you have perhaps only
today noticed for the first time in Scripture, belong to no other religion. They
belong to no present experience.
“The
ownership and the direction of the church belongs to no
pastor and to no elders…it belongs
to the brothers and the sisters! And to Jesus Christ. But to no other!
“I will
warn you that some brothers cannot handle such a life. Some, for instance,
simply must have some kind of status. I fear that kind of person. Fortunately,
this one does not stay around very long. Then there is the brother who cannot
stand so much drama. He thinks nobody should have so many problems nor face so
many decisions or pass through so much crisis, so often. He wants to go back to
a false, solo life. Can you blame him?
“Then
there is the brother who can’t handle inequalities; he is the brother who
says, ‘We are all equal.’
“We are as
unequal in a brothers meeting as we can get. We are different. We are not euqal.
There are some of us who have wisdom…there are brother who have
insight…there are brothers who are absolutely clueless. They walk into the
meeting clueless, they walk out of the meeting clueless. They stay clueless. Yet
all the above are still brothers. But not equal.
“Some men
are natural leaders. Thank God for that. But, oh, watching God (and brothers)
bread that natural leadership is a ghastly sight to see. (Just as God also
breaks the brother who wants no part of anything but peace and love, who faints
at the very idea of two brothers in the meeting having opposite opinions. God
breaking him is also not a pretty sight!)
“Don’t
ever try to make it an equal thing. It is never an equal thing. . . . the
paradigm constantly shifts.
“Ask men
in church life, ask men in a brothers meeting: Do you feel like someone is
watching you? In the church and in brothers meeting…no one is watching you.
The only person above you, watching you, is Jesus Christ!
“Brothers
meetings teach all of us submission. Brothers meetings—when well
expressed—put only one in authority, and King Himself./
“The
brothers in
Atlanta
meet, knock heads, seek the Lord, have fights, play football and do all sorts
of other things. But after a brothers meeting is over—if any decisions were
made, the brothers send one or two brothers to (humbly) report their decisions to
the sisters. The sisters listen to the brothers. (The sisters decide which
brothers they want to do the reporting to them.) Sometimes the sisters pow-wow.
Sometimes they consult and consider. Sometimes their responses are immediate.
Either way, they tell the brothers what is fine, not so fine, and what isn’t!
The brothers virtually always comply.
“This
arrangement works beautifully. Why? Because brothers are dangerous when left
alone to their own devices. Anyone would want checks and balances on them. Why?
Because brothers are stupid, that’s why!
“But be
careful. From what I have said you may get the impression there are brothers
meetings over here and sisters meetings over there. Actually there are probably
five times as many gatherings with everyone
present. It is hard to describe how things really work. Community, of this
style, is a place where there is daily input from everyone. You have to see it.
“Men go on
and on…in the early brothers
meetings. Eventually frustration seeps in. (Not many moons will pass before all
the men hate one another.)
“Finally…the
men make a decision…a naïve brother comes home and says, ‘Honey, we decided
to…’ The wife gives you this look. A short time later you brothers go back
and change your decision. You know why you will go back and change it? Because
we are all afraid of wives. And sisters that’s why! All that testosterone we
throw around in the brothers meetings doesn’t mean zip when it comes to
getting past the sisters.
“A year or
two passes. Look again at the brothers meetings. There are no longer any
principles involved. Nobody is wondering if there should or shouldn’t be a
name. Nor are they dealing with any of those other ponderous questions they once
pontificated over. They don’t’ give a flip any more.
“Now, here
is a curiosity. You should also know how much the sisters come to eventually
admire the brothers. How they become enthusiastic boosters of brothers having
brothers meetings.
“A lot of
the things men in church life today know about life itself is the result of
being brothers and being in brothers
meetings. Stretched out over ten years or so, you will see those meetings
produce men!
|